Welcome Aboard!

AHOY,


UPDATE 12/21/13, 11:42 HOURS

I am revealing who I am today i.e. posting my name, I am Keith Oeffinger, I was born in San Antonio Texas in 1963. See today's post 12/21/13 .


Update, 01/11/14 12:30 hours;

I would like to say, with only one reply, like three years ago, this blog seems too much like a mirror site to me. And it appears very few patriots are looking back at past posts.

The new “Fragmented Fighting Facts” series of posts that dedicates one post to each Basic rule has now been completed. This series starts with the post tilted “Post # 1, Planning, Preface” that posted on 05/12/13. This series is under the label “Tri-F in progress”. Posts well be updated as I edit or discover additional knowledge thus the series is the most current version of my "Fragmented Fighting Facts" manual. For an old but complete version i.e. all in one post copy. Patriots are welcomed to try viewing one of the “pages” listed in the “special word section” on the starboard side of the blog. I say try due to the fact I’m not sure if they are published i.e. viewable to the general public due to all the issues or HACKING with my blog. There is also a complete copy posted, that is titled, “Tri-F in progress” too, it was posted 11/13/10.

And feel free to fire away with a reply, (sarcasm on).


FLASH REPORT; the “TERRORIST ARE NOT AMONG US, AND NEVER WERE I.E. AL QAEDA IS A STAWL MAN, GHOST”.

The most important lesson that everyone should have taken away from the Boston Marathon bombings was that those young men proved that no al-queda members are in the u.s. Otherwise they too would just go get some presure cookers and had to a parade.

“I AM NOT A TERRORIST” this nation’s worst enemy is FEAR. This fear is being promoted mostly by the back woods, right wing, Christians of this nation. We need to separate church and state, period. And that is of course for the States sake.


I would like patriots to understand that I use the terms "official revealed fact" to mean what everyone is being told by officials, media etc. I use the term "kings truth" to mean what I know or believe to actually be the actual facts. I DO NOT MEAN IT IN A RELIGIOUS WAY. I.E. the term Kings is plural as in those running the show.


Preface for the Fragmented Fighting Facts

Note pink highlighted material is that, that IMO is questionable factually, it maybe an “official revealed fact” that I am questioning. The material may need to be defined i.e. explained more or it could be a personal note. Yellow is location undecided or unedited material i.e. unread that I have not decided on what to keep or not. Green means a change has been made i.e. an update. By noting the green updated highlights a Patriot well not have to read the Fragmented Fighting Facts in its entirety to stay current. Red is important, perhaps the "kings truth".

Newjarheaddean; this is my collection of combat notes. One might call it my anthology of combat tactics, techniques, methods and skills. The note taking began about fourty years ago (I was around 13 years old) with the observation of 10 rules listed with in a book covering the French and Indian i.e. Native American, wars, entitled “Roger’s Rangers”. That’s right the rules that started all this are “Army Ranger” rules, this book was located in the “Westfall” library in San Antonio Texas off of Vance Jackson. I get a kick out of the libraries name due to the general agreement that modern or state vs state warfare started with the singing of the peace treaties at Westphalia. I could not read at the time; however I knew that a list in a book on war would be important. I copied those rules down like a scribe might have written hieroglyphs and had my dad read them to me. . This discovery preceded numerous sources including approximately one hundred books and about a dozen field manuals, of which a few were of WWII era. These were found at libraries, half price bookstores and garage sales. Since going on line in 2007, I have found material on web sites such as “Defense and National Interest” (DNI), “Global security”, “Strategy page” , “Wikipedia” and “Bayonet strength” and “Efour4ever” in the combat lessons learned section. These last two sites cover WWII.

Previously referred to as K.O.O.L.N. (acronym definition, top secret), FLASH REPORTS; I NOW AM TELLING EVERYONE IT STANDS FOR KEITH OEFFINGER'S ORGANIZATION OF LEARNED KNOWLEDGE the joke on me here was I believed Knowledge was spelled with an (N). I was a special education student and did not learn to read until my last year of high school. I have now titled my work “Fragmented Fighting Facts” or “Tri-F”; the name derives from the computer grammar function always alerting me to the fragmented nature of my sentences. This is due to the “just the facts, ma’am” manor the material is written i.e. there has been little if any effort to write in whole sentences or provide context. This is not to say there is no order with Tri-F, in fact there is a theme. I have laid out the information as one might expect a commander or members of a unit to recall it thus utilizing it to conduct a mission.

We start with “Planning”, followed by the section on “Defense”, then there’s “Preparations and conduct of patrols” or “PCP”, and we end with “Conduct of Engagements” or “COE”, i.e. engagements being the term used here for shootouts. Each section of Tri-F consists of numbered “Basic rules”, each basic rule followed by detailed notes that either relate to, explain, or give examples pertaining to the basic rules. As with the general format of Tri-F, each section’s basic rules are laid out as one might need to recall them. This is most obvious in the last section COE starting with basic rule number one, “Flash report”, i.e. actions to take upon contact with the enemy. This sections last basic rule deals with handling POWs.

Keep in mind this is a work in progress; I’m constantly discovering new information to add which in turn still at times requires rearranging things. At the same time, interestingly enough to me, I have not needed to rearrange my original order of the basic rules for quite some time. There are however, two instances where the detailed information fallowing a pair of basic rules became so similar I decided to combine the pair into one basic rule. These two occurrences are noted in footnotes.

Now heed this, out of all the information contained within this work, only an estimated 1% was taught to me while I was serving in the U.S.M.C. Moreover, to put a fine point on it, it’s worth noting I served in Charlie Company, First Battalion, Fifth Marines, First Marine Division, i.e. an Infantry unit. Before my discharge (after only a two year cruse), I attended Jungle Warfare School in the northern training area of Okinawa (for two weeks), Mountain Warfare School in Korea (for one week) and Combat Town Camp Pendleton for MOUT training (for one day). I did not take part in any amphibious training nor did I ever go to Twenty Nine Palms for Desert Warfare training. We did ride around in AAVs once at Camp Pendleton. All in all I would say the only things I missed out on were a beach landing (at Coronado I believe) and a little sun burn, due to the fact that those twenty nine palms, I was told in the early eighties were all located at the front gate of that base. Needless to say, the training did not impress me, and I now know it was not going to get any better as some suggested to me at the time, and still others later claimed that I should have just stayed in longer.

With my position on the lack of training, I do wish to make it perfectly clear that I do support the service women and men in the U.S. armed forces. I also believe them to be as brave as any people on earth, (with the exception of the (Y) generation). My concern is in the way the Infantry especially is being mislead and used. I want people to understand my experience and IMO a lot of evidence suggests Uncle Sam intends to use his infantry in ways that does not include training any generation in the art of “traditional Guerilla combat tactics” i.e. as a “Traditional Commando” would be. I am not talking about “SWAT” team “Close quarter” tactics, like the “Stick dynamic entry”. That tactic should be called the “cluster f**k”. Just call that sort of tactic what it is NYPD (Cops T.V. show bad-boys, bad-boys) in Afghanistan.

The problem is that that tactic was developed by police departments to deal with an objective occupied by drugged up party animals, i.e. untrained civilians. The police never use it in a spur of the minute situation. They use it when the house/objective has been under constant surveillance for mouths in some cases and the police know all manner of information about everyone in the house and the structure and neighborhood in general. The cops choose a time when everyone is pasted out from partying the night before and have long lost any weapons (between the cushions or under the bed) they might have had on them as show pieces during the party. The primary reason for the large numbers of police in close proximity is to make sure the gang does not think the raid is a rival gang “brake in” and thus resist in any way. There is lots of yelling too, thus reinforcing the message that no one is trying to be covert, like one would be to get away with a crime.

This brings up an intriguing observation of mine; that being that by the book an assault should be made from the top down, yet the troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere use the Stick dynamic entry and usually enter from the front door, like a SWAT team. However resent high profile raids show the SWAT teams attacking from the top down. Examples you may recall are the raids on the Shinning path group in Peru in 2000 and the Mumbai raid by Indian forces on the Jewish center in 2008. IMO this proves the existence of what I’ll refer to as a “need to know” training policy, being followed by various governments, the purpose being to limit the number of true Commandos that could become tomorrow’s rebels, apposing corrupt governments. One last thing about the Stick, IMO every single time the regular forces unit conducting one of these foolish Stick dynamic entries comes under fire i.e. runs into resistance, the Stick brakes i.e. the whole unit evacuates and awaits some kind of support form tanks, guns, tubes or air. Bottom line IMO the Stick is used as a probing tactic and is meant to be a moral boosting show peace tactic to make the unit feel as if it has taken a hill, which was nothing more than another empty building, that IMO Intel suggested, was the case before the entry was ordered. Recalling the police policy of long periods of surveillance prior to raids.

It also seems to me that in light of the old saying “you can fight a war with bombs and blockades but only boots on the ground can win it” ( IMO, Uncle Sam has now revised that saying, as fallows) “you can win a war with bombs and blockades, but only the infantry can end the war”, farther more IMO Uncle Sam has gone one more step and decided to use private security companies and local i.e. indigenous people for the infantry role. All this fear of true commandos is all very similar to the “Mujahideen” not being allowed by various governments, to return to their homelands i.e. native nations, after fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan.

And as for the U.S. and other Western nations, training foreigners to fight a counter insurgency goes. IMO this training includes nothing more than police procedures i.e. conducting investigations, forensics, searching individuals and buildings to collect evidence and yes serving warrants, if necessary, with those all mighty “stick” tactics. And of course, lots of “new innovative techniques and tactics” involving CAS and IMO (Old) so called high tech equipment the U.S. Military Industrial Congressional Complex wants to clear out of the warehouses.

All in all IMO Uncle Sam has chosen to put just about all his eggs in one advanced technology system, think Star Wars Storm Troopers or Matrix i.e. the Operator or Morpheus trying to guide Neo and others to safety. IMO it looks something like this; (x) unit go to (x) address, kick in front door, use stairs to your right, go south down hallway to (x) door, it is unlocked, interning room go to (x) window looking out window to the north you will see your target running east though the neighbors garden. All this information and the “live” feeds of target and area of operations would be provided by a fleet of satellites as well as Near space assets that are never mentioned by the media as current military assets and of course there’s the robots, UAVs and a flood of other covertly deployed sensors as well as covert eves dropping of any civilian electronic devices in the Area of operations.

Thus in light of these and similar so called “new innovative, techniques and tactics” (notice the media and governments choice of words “techniques and tactics” as if we’re talking Commando training i.e. why not use some modern high tech terms the system is so eager to introduce us all to normally as a matter of routine), IMO Uncle Sam has placed the traditional Guerrilla combat tactics, on the back burner and is hoping they all go the way of other black arts.

This is not just true of the infantry; let us take a peek at aerial combat. Does anyone out there actually think today’s U.S. pilots are turning and burning, pulling high (G) maneuvers trying to hit the entry windows and get inside the bandits turn. Think any pilot has conducted a yo-yo or split S maneuver lately or made the choice between a single or two-circle fight. Now days its all about stealth, ECM and Smart even autonomous weapons, missiles especially BVR tech. IMO this explains why the U.S. Navy is not concerned with not having a front line fighter equal to the USAF F-22 Raptor. An article I recently read on “Strategy page” mentioned a lot of talk about a Navy F/A-18E at an air show, displaying a little F-22 silhouette decal i.e. a simulated Kill credit symbol/icon. IMO the F/A- 18E did not gun down that kill.

And then everyone knows that just about all now and IMO soon all weapons systems including the bayonet well have a chip in it.

So if the electronics ever fail (maybe due to a shift in the axis of earths electromagnetic field, passed a certain point or perhaps a record size solar flare) IMO it well be the masters of the age-old Guerrilla combat tactics i.e. The Fragmented Fighting Facts Basic Rules that survive, keeping in mind “no one wins”.

I also wish, that those who join the various services where told all this up front i.e. “we do not intend to train you as a traditional Commando”.

Another thing I would like everyone to consider is that; what makes a Marine special is not the training she or he receives, no it’s the steel the youth demonstrates when they choose to join the Marines. Even when compared to the Special Forces, who IMO are only specialists in their particular field, once again mostly high tech specialties and whose ranks are filled with older personnel that have already been serving and have graduated from a boot camp i.e. are aware of the hoop and hype hurry up and wait tactics. And who are then usually chosen i.e. coached into changing their MOS. I am aware of the change in recruitment policy after 2001 allowing for direct entry into the S.F. community. IMO a rarity and IMO it is still not the same as just choosing to go to a Marine Corps Recruit Depot from the start.

Furthermore, to those who just well not accept the truth about the lack of training along the lines of traditional Guerrilla combat tactics. I can now say that I have exchanged comments with a number of Iraqi and Afghanistan combat vets. These comments can be found on the internet if you Google up my call sign, Newjarheaddean also spelled with one (D). IMO it is obvious that the tactics I speak of are news to the vets, some have made commits that proves in combat they were just winging it. And no, I don’t believe that all the vets are observing some kind of code of silence on these tactics including the vets who are against the wars. Unless everyone wants to say that YouTube and other internet companies are conspiring to edit all combat footage that shows these tactics being used and that, the vets are staging other videos that show them (albeit with great bravery) as armatures without a clue and winging it. If anyone ever sees video, showing the tactics listed in Tri-F being used, be sure and provide a link with your comment. I once saw a flash of film on CNN showing combat in Lebanon during the 1980s that showed some of these tactics being used by a Guerrilla fighter. I well also say I do believe that UAV footage is edited by the Pentagon to keep the public from seeing the few but well trained Taliban and other Guerrilla fighters that are using these tactics. Alternatively, maybe people think our professional highly trained well-equipped military is unable to defeat 10 – 20 thousand religious extremist amateur thugs in almost a decade of fighting. All the while killing at least by some estimates 100 a mouth including dozens of top commanders.

Let me also say, on the numbers of U.S. PTSD casualties, i.e. IMO, WIA, (And IMO deserving of a Purple Heart). The Government portrays these cases as a result of fighting a war that is “unlike any other war we have fought before” (LOL). Facing an enemy that is fighting in some mysterious and or cowardly manor that simply cannot be countered by military means. I believe the high numbers are a result of US forces fighting in a manner that is suicidal i.e. pointless and counterproductive to the real world situation. Example; you have a young brave American ready to fight for the nation, while on one of these IMO “Russian roulette parades” someone shoots at the unit from some building, everyone scrambles for cover, as some spray and pray, then after determining the location using SWATS (Soldier Worn Acoustic Targeting Systems) sniper detectors, or one of the many similar vehicle mounted systems the commander calls in some sort of CAS, if someone’s brains have been blow out especially if it was an officer or the location is vague, a real “crowd pleaser” maybe used i.e. 2000 pounder.

IMO this is how 90% of engagements (fought by regular infantry units) are resolved. Special Forces are now and in the feature more and more regular infantry well be using the Matrix. And to those that think this is the exception I say show me the number of WIA or KIA (On either side) by small arms fire i.e. during traditional firefights. Even if one includes sniper fire those figures are really low. So IMO after witnessing all the carnage and innocent civilian life being lost and receiving all those looks from the witnesses, it is the American that realizes it is his unit that is not fighting right.

This is reinforced and really sinks in back in the states when the vet is asked to tell the Commando stories that never occurred and thus the vet must tell the truth i.e. give up the Commando reputation, keep it all inside or start lying. If the first option is chosen that unveiling reality is demoralizing and makes it all not worth it. If either one of the other chooses are made IMO the vet becomes the ticking bomb. And I can tell you all that many times, I have recalled being told once that “when you go home keep your mouth shut about the things we did. If you don’t you well be thought of as a liar or crazy and either which way your life well be over”. That First Sergeant was right, but like my daddy use to say, “He’s right but he does not know why he’s right” i.e. IMO the First Sgt. thought of what we did in terms of remarkable heroic feats. However, IMO certainly since the beginning of the Vietnam era, it is the lack of training i.e. the manner in which our service women and men are fighting that keeps this tragedy going.

I would also suggest the vets of today are just like I was 25 or so years ago in the sense that they know there training is lacking, however, they just cannot explain what’s missing. However unlike me they refuse to accept that old fashion “black arts” are the answer i.e. should be the basis of basic training. And I now know the “Black art” tactics they and I should have been trained in and I can now say, “The PFC that told the Corp it was out of step, now has provided the proof”. What surprises me is that most vets it seems don’t care at all about the tactics I speak of and seem to view me as an unpatriotic “party pooper”, when I’m just a U.S. Marine trying to improve the Corps and save lives. Bottom line IMO the infantry needs to consist of unmarried i.e. undistracted, NO CHILDREN, dedicated true professionals, trained in the tactics listed in Tri-F and many more I am sure exist.

And to those that say “chivalry is for the museums” I say “first we must have peace on earth”.

One Newjarheaddean

“Let no Marines ghost say if my training had only done its job”

" Give me a million dollars and I well change the world"

" When it comes to persecution and suffering that fairly tale about christ dose not have (S) nothing on me"

" I well bet my lucky start"

“IKYG”

G-day!

Update; 12/19/14 09/53 hours




Total Pageviews

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Afghanistan Combat

AHOY,

Update; 03/02/13 11:13 hours. I have done a final update to this post. I also removed all the characters that appeared on this post that I never typed in. It was a series of characters that some hacker did I guess. Anyhow I had let them remain so google could see them etc. I decided to day they had been there long enough. I did not highlight any of the editing or changes I made here, I'm trying to clean this place up.


Original text of post starts here;

well things are worse than I thought, it seems most serving not only don’t know traditional Guerrilla combat tactics but don’t care either, but I’m compromising the Bull Sh*t cover on this commando reputation BS. And I know and can proudly say I've taught myself 100% more about combat than I was ever trained for when I was in harms way. If all you highly educated commanders would get your Brain Housing Groups out of the whole in the sand, life’s would be saved. It all reminds me of the sub prime mortgages scam, i.e. sad pride mongers.
Now lets look at the keystone cops situations with Operation Anaconda, these are just a few highlights, TF Hammer having to use their head lights after one truck over turned, sub unit of TF Hammer getting hammered by Grim 31 an AC-130 gunship.

What a landing by the 101 first AB and 10th mountain units, situation describes Taliban occupying high ground around valley, (Yeah, think) yeah that high ground is just where the 101 and 10th should have wonted to land in the first place right? Then there’s the situation with the 1/87th in the “half pipe” IMO i.e. dead space the Taliban had zeroed their mortars already. And was probably the location of a large percentage of u.s. WIA. Speaking of WIA the only motor 1/87 brought with them was taken out, IMO that act was the source of most WIA i.e. due to chain reaction of poorly stored ammo. Then there was 1/87 in its southern blocking position also said to be receiving the heaviest fire. Then just before nightfall (you got to be lying), I thought we owned the night so just as the tide might have turned they withdrawal to "reinforce" lol (you got to be lying) the unit to the north. Just opposite of what should have been done i.e. why not have northern unit reinforce southern. IMO generals were putting all the sheep in one pin to circle the wagons i.e. Shepard drones and other CAS, so units would not be over run that night.
On the request for the use of sub-munitions being denied, IMO the plan was not to coat the entire boarder with them. No the generals knew about the half dozen or so routes out of the area, they did not want to nor did they place units in those areas to block any Badactors escape lol or "infiltration". IMO the generals did not want to split the units up out of fear they would be over run.

And then there is Takur Ghar hill, no way anyone’s making since of that situation. It was stated that the pilot could not turn the helo around (like its a big 18 wheeler) to return to the hill. Why did he lift off in the first place? They were under heavy fire, so what the pilot takes off while chock is exiting? And the (QRF) i.e. Delta force splits up in route to hill because why, they thought they were needed else where, where? Just like in Operation Red wing, and on and on….

And then there was this UK battle I read about, which puts my respect for the UK service men and women in doubt. This situation involved what was referred to as “Three walls”. In the battle basically a UK unit was walking right down the middle of an open field with an (L) shaped ditch (containing a Taliban unit in waiting) on one corner another ditch along the opposite side and an old building with only three remaining walls. Once the Badactors LOL, sprung their perfectly executed classic ambush the UK forces actually took up position at Three Walls. IMO they should have never been walking in the middle of that field, and could have used three walls as cover without taking up residence in it, i.e. positioning themselves so the structure was between them and the Badactors. I’m glad the Badactors did not have the structure rigged with explosives. And I can here the vets now all drunk in some pub yelling "were you at three walls".
Keep in mind the Taliban are armed like the 1960s Vietcong, although no one seems to know where they get their weapons. I suspect the CIA, lol, This last suggestion is based on my belief that those running things in this world are really only playing war. G-day!

Update 8/2/09

Ever notice when ever you here about British KIA the report well just list the X number of British Marines or soldiers KIA and a location. It almost never mentions IEDs as being the cause of death. However U.S. KIA reports are almost always accompanied by the IED acronym. My point is that IMO this is do to the fact the British are traveling light and are getting up close to the enemy i.e. using actual infantry/guerrilla combat tactics. Where as the U.S. is still riding around in vehicles like the Soviet's the U.S criticized so much. So the UK and other European troops are having many more shoot outs with the taliban, where as the U.S. is running over IEDs.

Update 8/12/09

AHOY,
Associated Press article by Alfred de Montesquiou 8/14/09
Town of DAHANEH, operation/offensive "Eastern Resolve 2," note things stated in the article are in italics. Newjarheaddean’s responses are not.
Associated Press journalists traveling with the first wave said militants fired small arms, mortars and rocket-propelled grenades after helicopters dropped the troops over Taliban lines.
Newjarheaddean; I thought there were no lines, and IMO the drop was way over i.e. past or beyond any Taliban locations. Later the report writes…
The Marines arrived in helicopters under cover of darkness, but at morning light, militants unleashed their weapons.
So like I said way over their, not in the town, and the opposition fired first.
So most likely the Marines hunkered down in a defensive position and it was the Taliban who came out fighting. 
The Taliban put up such fierce resistance and Marines said they suspected the militants knew the assault was coming.
IMO if the Taliban knew the Marines were coming they would have shot a few RPGs off at the LZ or HLZ (helicopter landing zone) for you modern professional warfighters. LoL
It was the first time NATO troops had entered Dahaneh, which has been under Taliban control for years.
Well, so much for “routing the Taliban reports” just a few years back by the same media reporting all this now.
Marines said they killed between seven and 10 militants in Wednesday's push and seized about 66 pounds (30 kilograms) of opium, which the militants use to finance their insurgency.
Notice the use of the term militants here, not Taliban. However the goal is to associated the Taliban with drugs. It is a fact, that various drugs are used by the Taliban for treating the wounded. I’m surprised the Marines did not find more drugs given the areas history. IMO the Taliban do not carry or store drugs to sale. And IMO if the numbers Intel is correct, there was and are a lot more then a dozen or so Taliban in that town.
The goal is to cut off the Taliban from a major rear base, and reclaim the area's market district. It is hoped this would have a ripple effect through nearby villages, making civilians more willing to cooperate with NATO forces.
Most likely we well never see any video of the open thriving market, the town well turn into a ghost town and the ripple effect well be the refugee flow.
"In the long term, it could have tremendous effects for the entire province," said Martin, whose company is based in Naw Zad, five miles (10 kilometers) to the north.
So unless the company is going to be based 10 kilometers to the north in name only the company sure isn't going to be able to stay and live with the locals in Dahaneh.
I saw some video on this operation; I wish the camera men would learn the old “spray and pray” i.e. hold the camera up and over the wall as they (the cameramen) stay down behind the wall, to film all those Taliban being hit by all those rounds the Marines are putting down range. IMO 99.99 % of the time there’s nothing to be shooting at. The video showed what looked like a LAV breaching a wall, I would bet that wasn't necessary and that, it will, do wonders for the P.R., but it's their (2/3s) Hue. LOL.
This article mentions the same unit (2/3) that was involved in operation Red wings. I recently posted on DNI about the book covering this supposedly great true story. IMO the article above and the book is 90% B.S.. Below is my DNI post the topic was “how would Boyd (i.e. the late renown military sage Col. Boyd USAF) analyze Afghanistan"…
I like to think Boyd would point out that observing Afghanistan though the eyes of the western media is more misleading than helpful. Example, I just read the book “Victory Point” by Ed Darak. He begins the book with a real trashing of the medias and its poor coverage, then IMO doubles down on the nonsense.
He talks about MT. warfare training but never is a rope or knot mentioned. He only mentions UAVs excuse me UASs (this was an acronym that thank god never took hold the S stood for system) a couple of times on or about page 150 and 240. I got a kick out of him writing that the S2 was looking over a hard copy of an oblique aerial photo, LOL, like the S2 would not have a feed on his laptop to manipulate in all kinds of ways. NVGs are mentioned only twice, once that a pair had stopped a bullet lol yes he used that age old sh*t. And someone should tell those over dramatic yelling NCOs that sound travels real far in the valleys. And then after all the sweating, vomiting, burning thighs, climbing all day long that was mention, Ahmad Shah i.e. the villain leader and his crew of evil doers always had the high ground.
He mentions on page XVII exceeding his officially allotted time of ten days by nearly three weeks. IMO the government gives the ten day pass, which is just enough time to get you in place, then once your pass is up, if you should try reporting some real news, you are subject to arrest for not having an up to date chit. That is to say "It appears your pagers are out of order", lol.
And I just bought me a new monitor with great resolution, and so now I can say that the always/still grainy combat video is IMO purposely that way and the sheephood is not only silent, they cheer it on i.e. think its great as long as the porn is H.D.

UPDATE 8/14/09 note this information was moved from "All according to plan" post posted on...

05/19/09 Bill Roggio of The Standard wrote on 05/18/09 The Pakistani Army's idea of fighting a counterinsurgency is to move the artillery up or call in air or helicopter strikes, and level entire villages. This of course makes the Army hated:
Newjarheaddean show me one entire village destroyed. IMO they have destroyed an entire ranch or farm but no entire villages. Anyways where is the out cry here from the U.S. government, that is so concerned about civilian casualties. This is the same war we are fighting. These thugs (Pakistan Army) are destroying all our efforts to win hearts and minds in that area (LOL). I also noticed the U.S. media had no problem showing that image of the missile attack by Pak helo, on that one house. Again why dose the media not understand they are undermining our allies efforts (LOL). IMO its all propaganda to make the U.S. look like the good guys.

UPDATE 8/16/09 yesterday on CNN I noticed some video on a shoot’em up in Afghanistan. notice I said shoot’em up not shoot out or firefight.
What a bunch of hoop and hype drama queen B.S. Those kids (U.S. Army unit) were shooting at any and everything in the area. The impacts from there shots were kicking up so much dust and thus providing the perfect concealment for anyone who would have been out there shooting at them. The reporter said “they are looking, looking and then, they spotted it, muzzle flashes”. WHAT B.S., why did the camera not catch the muzzle flash. And then the camera did its quick half a*ss zoom and out and zoom and sweep etc B.S. IMO there was no depth (as in brush for anyone to take up position in) to the steep cliff that was being killed by the Army.
Then the segment showed to kids (troopers), all worked up into thinking they had survived a real firefight, one was asked by a reporter “why do you think you’re here”? He laughed and said “you don’t ask that question” then turned to another member and sad “right” etc. the other kid added “you don’t ask any questions, you get in trouble that way”.
Oh wow, I thought what combat veterans we have here, actually no different than your average gang banger, except the gang banger has to provide his own meals and other essential logistics.

UPDATE 8/21/09
I saw it, and I know lots of others are aware of it too. However I bet I’m the only one that well point it out. Can you imagine, the only one that well point it out.

While watching a link TV video on the door to door operations in Dahaneh, I saw that it was the ANA members that are kicking in the doors and interring the homes while the US Marines stand guard out side. And I have no doubt if someone inside opens fire the Marines well spray the place down with lead, take cover and call for CAS.

My point; the western media words its reports to make it sound like the ANA members are merely doing interviews and searching through belongings to oblige the locals. When the situation is ANA are first and foremost conducting the raids, with the Marines backing them up. IMO mainly with CAS.

9/01/09

While watching Democracy Now on or about the 26th of August, I saw a report about a helicopter fly by shoot'em up on this hospital where a Taliban leader of some kind was suppose to be inside getting treatment.
This is a good example of a point I made a while back, that being that when the U.S. finds out where one of these important targets (HVT, LOL) is they well not send in the troops to get them, (missing out on all the valuable info etc.) lol and IMO saving the lives of all the should be Rambo's. (true professional Warfighters) that the U.S. dose not have.

So like I said on the 16th "U.S. troops are no different than your average gang banger". However they do use "fly by-s" not just "drive by-s".

G-day!


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)