Welcome Aboard!

AHOY,


UPDATE 12/21/13, 11:42 HOURS

I am revealing who I am today i.e. posting my name, I am Keith Oeffinger, I was born in San Antonio Texas in 1963. See today's post 12/21/13 .


Update, 01/11/14 12:30 hours;

I would like to say, with only one reply, like three years ago, this blog seems too much like a mirror site to me. And it appears very few patriots are looking back at past posts.

The new “Fragmented Fighting Facts” series of posts that dedicates one post to each Basic rule has now been completed. This series starts with the post tilted “Post # 1, Planning, Preface” that posted on 05/12/13. This series is under the label “Tri-F in progress”. Posts well be updated as I edit or discover additional knowledge thus the series is the most current version of my "Fragmented Fighting Facts" manual. For an old but complete version i.e. all in one post copy. Patriots are welcomed to try viewing one of the “pages” listed in the “special word section” on the starboard side of the blog. I say try due to the fact I’m not sure if they are published i.e. viewable to the general public due to all the issues or HACKING with my blog. There is also a complete copy posted, that is titled, “Tri-F in progress” too, it was posted 11/13/10.

And feel free to fire away with a reply, (sarcasm on).


FLASH REPORT; the “TERRORIST ARE NOT AMONG US, AND NEVER WERE I.E. AL QAEDA IS A STAWL MAN, GHOST”.

The most important lesson that everyone should have taken away from the Boston Marathon bombings was that those young men proved that no al-queda members are in the u.s. Otherwise they too would just go get some presure cookers and had to a parade.

“I AM NOT A TERRORIST” this nation’s worst enemy is FEAR. This fear is being promoted mostly by the back woods, right wing, Christians of this nation. We need to separate church and state, period. And that is of course for the States sake.


I would like patriots to understand that I use the terms "official revealed fact" to mean what everyone is being told by officials, media etc. I use the term "kings truth" to mean what I know or believe to actually be the actual facts. I DO NOT MEAN IT IN A RELIGIOUS WAY. I.E. the term Kings is plural as in those running the show.


Preface for the Fragmented Fighting Facts

Note pink highlighted material is that, that IMO is questionable factually, it maybe an “official revealed fact” that I am questioning. The material may need to be defined i.e. explained more or it could be a personal note. Yellow is location undecided or unedited material i.e. unread that I have not decided on what to keep or not. Green means a change has been made i.e. an update. By noting the green updated highlights a Patriot well not have to read the Fragmented Fighting Facts in its entirety to stay current. Red is important, perhaps the "kings truth".

Newjarheaddean; this is my collection of combat notes. One might call it my anthology of combat tactics, techniques, methods and skills. The note taking began about fourty years ago (I was around 13 years old) with the observation of 10 rules listed with in a book covering the French and Indian i.e. Native American, wars, entitled “Roger’s Rangers”. That’s right the rules that started all this are “Army Ranger” rules, this book was located in the “Westfall” library in San Antonio Texas off of Vance Jackson. I get a kick out of the libraries name due to the general agreement that modern or state vs state warfare started with the singing of the peace treaties at Westphalia. I could not read at the time; however I knew that a list in a book on war would be important. I copied those rules down like a scribe might have written hieroglyphs and had my dad read them to me. . This discovery preceded numerous sources including approximately one hundred books and about a dozen field manuals, of which a few were of WWII era. These were found at libraries, half price bookstores and garage sales. Since going on line in 2007, I have found material on web sites such as “Defense and National Interest” (DNI), “Global security”, “Strategy page” , “Wikipedia” and “Bayonet strength” and “Efour4ever” in the combat lessons learned section. These last two sites cover WWII.

Previously referred to as K.O.O.L.N. (acronym definition, top secret), FLASH REPORTS; I NOW AM TELLING EVERYONE IT STANDS FOR KEITH OEFFINGER'S ORGANIZATION OF LEARNED KNOWLEDGE the joke on me here was I believed Knowledge was spelled with an (N). I was a special education student and did not learn to read until my last year of high school. I have now titled my work “Fragmented Fighting Facts” or “Tri-F”; the name derives from the computer grammar function always alerting me to the fragmented nature of my sentences. This is due to the “just the facts, ma’am” manor the material is written i.e. there has been little if any effort to write in whole sentences or provide context. This is not to say there is no order with Tri-F, in fact there is a theme. I have laid out the information as one might expect a commander or members of a unit to recall it thus utilizing it to conduct a mission.

We start with “Planning”, followed by the section on “Defense”, then there’s “Preparations and conduct of patrols” or “PCP”, and we end with “Conduct of Engagements” or “COE”, i.e. engagements being the term used here for shootouts. Each section of Tri-F consists of numbered “Basic rules”, each basic rule followed by detailed notes that either relate to, explain, or give examples pertaining to the basic rules. As with the general format of Tri-F, each section’s basic rules are laid out as one might need to recall them. This is most obvious in the last section COE starting with basic rule number one, “Flash report”, i.e. actions to take upon contact with the enemy. This sections last basic rule deals with handling POWs.

Keep in mind this is a work in progress; I’m constantly discovering new information to add which in turn still at times requires rearranging things. At the same time, interestingly enough to me, I have not needed to rearrange my original order of the basic rules for quite some time. There are however, two instances where the detailed information fallowing a pair of basic rules became so similar I decided to combine the pair into one basic rule. These two occurrences are noted in footnotes.

Now heed this, out of all the information contained within this work, only an estimated 1% was taught to me while I was serving in the U.S.M.C. Moreover, to put a fine point on it, it’s worth noting I served in Charlie Company, First Battalion, Fifth Marines, First Marine Division, i.e. an Infantry unit. Before my discharge (after only a two year cruse), I attended Jungle Warfare School in the northern training area of Okinawa (for two weeks), Mountain Warfare School in Korea (for one week) and Combat Town Camp Pendleton for MOUT training (for one day). I did not take part in any amphibious training nor did I ever go to Twenty Nine Palms for Desert Warfare training. We did ride around in AAVs once at Camp Pendleton. All in all I would say the only things I missed out on were a beach landing (at Coronado I believe) and a little sun burn, due to the fact that those twenty nine palms, I was told in the early eighties were all located at the front gate of that base. Needless to say, the training did not impress me, and I now know it was not going to get any better as some suggested to me at the time, and still others later claimed that I should have just stayed in longer.

With my position on the lack of training, I do wish to make it perfectly clear that I do support the service women and men in the U.S. armed forces. I also believe them to be as brave as any people on earth, (with the exception of the (Y) generation). My concern is in the way the Infantry especially is being mislead and used. I want people to understand my experience and IMO a lot of evidence suggests Uncle Sam intends to use his infantry in ways that does not include training any generation in the art of “traditional Guerilla combat tactics” i.e. as a “Traditional Commando” would be. I am not talking about “SWAT” team “Close quarter” tactics, like the “Stick dynamic entry”. That tactic should be called the “cluster f**k”. Just call that sort of tactic what it is NYPD (Cops T.V. show bad-boys, bad-boys) in Afghanistan.

The problem is that that tactic was developed by police departments to deal with an objective occupied by drugged up party animals, i.e. untrained civilians. The police never use it in a spur of the minute situation. They use it when the house/objective has been under constant surveillance for mouths in some cases and the police know all manner of information about everyone in the house and the structure and neighborhood in general. The cops choose a time when everyone is pasted out from partying the night before and have long lost any weapons (between the cushions or under the bed) they might have had on them as show pieces during the party. The primary reason for the large numbers of police in close proximity is to make sure the gang does not think the raid is a rival gang “brake in” and thus resist in any way. There is lots of yelling too, thus reinforcing the message that no one is trying to be covert, like one would be to get away with a crime.

This brings up an intriguing observation of mine; that being that by the book an assault should be made from the top down, yet the troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere use the Stick dynamic entry and usually enter from the front door, like a SWAT team. However resent high profile raids show the SWAT teams attacking from the top down. Examples you may recall are the raids on the Shinning path group in Peru in 2000 and the Mumbai raid by Indian forces on the Jewish center in 2008. IMO this proves the existence of what I’ll refer to as a “need to know” training policy, being followed by various governments, the purpose being to limit the number of true Commandos that could become tomorrow’s rebels, apposing corrupt governments. One last thing about the Stick, IMO every single time the regular forces unit conducting one of these foolish Stick dynamic entries comes under fire i.e. runs into resistance, the Stick brakes i.e. the whole unit evacuates and awaits some kind of support form tanks, guns, tubes or air. Bottom line IMO the Stick is used as a probing tactic and is meant to be a moral boosting show peace tactic to make the unit feel as if it has taken a hill, which was nothing more than another empty building, that IMO Intel suggested, was the case before the entry was ordered. Recalling the police policy of long periods of surveillance prior to raids.

It also seems to me that in light of the old saying “you can fight a war with bombs and blockades but only boots on the ground can win it” ( IMO, Uncle Sam has now revised that saying, as fallows) “you can win a war with bombs and blockades, but only the infantry can end the war”, farther more IMO Uncle Sam has gone one more step and decided to use private security companies and local i.e. indigenous people for the infantry role. All this fear of true commandos is all very similar to the “Mujahideen” not being allowed by various governments, to return to their homelands i.e. native nations, after fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan.

And as for the U.S. and other Western nations, training foreigners to fight a counter insurgency goes. IMO this training includes nothing more than police procedures i.e. conducting investigations, forensics, searching individuals and buildings to collect evidence and yes serving warrants, if necessary, with those all mighty “stick” tactics. And of course, lots of “new innovative techniques and tactics” involving CAS and IMO (Old) so called high tech equipment the U.S. Military Industrial Congressional Complex wants to clear out of the warehouses.

All in all IMO Uncle Sam has chosen to put just about all his eggs in one advanced technology system, think Star Wars Storm Troopers or Matrix i.e. the Operator or Morpheus trying to guide Neo and others to safety. IMO it looks something like this; (x) unit go to (x) address, kick in front door, use stairs to your right, go south down hallway to (x) door, it is unlocked, interning room go to (x) window looking out window to the north you will see your target running east though the neighbors garden. All this information and the “live” feeds of target and area of operations would be provided by a fleet of satellites as well as Near space assets that are never mentioned by the media as current military assets and of course there’s the robots, UAVs and a flood of other covertly deployed sensors as well as covert eves dropping of any civilian electronic devices in the Area of operations.

Thus in light of these and similar so called “new innovative, techniques and tactics” (notice the media and governments choice of words “techniques and tactics” as if we’re talking Commando training i.e. why not use some modern high tech terms the system is so eager to introduce us all to normally as a matter of routine), IMO Uncle Sam has placed the traditional Guerrilla combat tactics, on the back burner and is hoping they all go the way of other black arts.

This is not just true of the infantry; let us take a peek at aerial combat. Does anyone out there actually think today’s U.S. pilots are turning and burning, pulling high (G) maneuvers trying to hit the entry windows and get inside the bandits turn. Think any pilot has conducted a yo-yo or split S maneuver lately or made the choice between a single or two-circle fight. Now days its all about stealth, ECM and Smart even autonomous weapons, missiles especially BVR tech. IMO this explains why the U.S. Navy is not concerned with not having a front line fighter equal to the USAF F-22 Raptor. An article I recently read on “Strategy page” mentioned a lot of talk about a Navy F/A-18E at an air show, displaying a little F-22 silhouette decal i.e. a simulated Kill credit symbol/icon. IMO the F/A- 18E did not gun down that kill.

And then everyone knows that just about all now and IMO soon all weapons systems including the bayonet well have a chip in it.

So if the electronics ever fail (maybe due to a shift in the axis of earths electromagnetic field, passed a certain point or perhaps a record size solar flare) IMO it well be the masters of the age-old Guerrilla combat tactics i.e. The Fragmented Fighting Facts Basic Rules that survive, keeping in mind “no one wins”.

I also wish, that those who join the various services where told all this up front i.e. “we do not intend to train you as a traditional Commando”.

Another thing I would like everyone to consider is that; what makes a Marine special is not the training she or he receives, no it’s the steel the youth demonstrates when they choose to join the Marines. Even when compared to the Special Forces, who IMO are only specialists in their particular field, once again mostly high tech specialties and whose ranks are filled with older personnel that have already been serving and have graduated from a boot camp i.e. are aware of the hoop and hype hurry up and wait tactics. And who are then usually chosen i.e. coached into changing their MOS. I am aware of the change in recruitment policy after 2001 allowing for direct entry into the S.F. community. IMO a rarity and IMO it is still not the same as just choosing to go to a Marine Corps Recruit Depot from the start.

Furthermore, to those who just well not accept the truth about the lack of training along the lines of traditional Guerrilla combat tactics. I can now say that I have exchanged comments with a number of Iraqi and Afghanistan combat vets. These comments can be found on the internet if you Google up my call sign, Newjarheaddean also spelled with one (D). IMO it is obvious that the tactics I speak of are news to the vets, some have made commits that proves in combat they were just winging it. And no, I don’t believe that all the vets are observing some kind of code of silence on these tactics including the vets who are against the wars. Unless everyone wants to say that YouTube and other internet companies are conspiring to edit all combat footage that shows these tactics being used and that, the vets are staging other videos that show them (albeit with great bravery) as armatures without a clue and winging it. If anyone ever sees video, showing the tactics listed in Tri-F being used, be sure and provide a link with your comment. I once saw a flash of film on CNN showing combat in Lebanon during the 1980s that showed some of these tactics being used by a Guerrilla fighter. I well also say I do believe that UAV footage is edited by the Pentagon to keep the public from seeing the few but well trained Taliban and other Guerrilla fighters that are using these tactics. Alternatively, maybe people think our professional highly trained well-equipped military is unable to defeat 10 – 20 thousand religious extremist amateur thugs in almost a decade of fighting. All the while killing at least by some estimates 100 a mouth including dozens of top commanders.

Let me also say, on the numbers of U.S. PTSD casualties, i.e. IMO, WIA, (And IMO deserving of a Purple Heart). The Government portrays these cases as a result of fighting a war that is “unlike any other war we have fought before” (LOL). Facing an enemy that is fighting in some mysterious and or cowardly manor that simply cannot be countered by military means. I believe the high numbers are a result of US forces fighting in a manner that is suicidal i.e. pointless and counterproductive to the real world situation. Example; you have a young brave American ready to fight for the nation, while on one of these IMO “Russian roulette parades” someone shoots at the unit from some building, everyone scrambles for cover, as some spray and pray, then after determining the location using SWATS (Soldier Worn Acoustic Targeting Systems) sniper detectors, or one of the many similar vehicle mounted systems the commander calls in some sort of CAS, if someone’s brains have been blow out especially if it was an officer or the location is vague, a real “crowd pleaser” maybe used i.e. 2000 pounder.

IMO this is how 90% of engagements (fought by regular infantry units) are resolved. Special Forces are now and in the feature more and more regular infantry well be using the Matrix. And to those that think this is the exception I say show me the number of WIA or KIA (On either side) by small arms fire i.e. during traditional firefights. Even if one includes sniper fire those figures are really low. So IMO after witnessing all the carnage and innocent civilian life being lost and receiving all those looks from the witnesses, it is the American that realizes it is his unit that is not fighting right.

This is reinforced and really sinks in back in the states when the vet is asked to tell the Commando stories that never occurred and thus the vet must tell the truth i.e. give up the Commando reputation, keep it all inside or start lying. If the first option is chosen that unveiling reality is demoralizing and makes it all not worth it. If either one of the other chooses are made IMO the vet becomes the ticking bomb. And I can tell you all that many times, I have recalled being told once that “when you go home keep your mouth shut about the things we did. If you don’t you well be thought of as a liar or crazy and either which way your life well be over”. That First Sergeant was right, but like my daddy use to say, “He’s right but he does not know why he’s right” i.e. IMO the First Sgt. thought of what we did in terms of remarkable heroic feats. However, IMO certainly since the beginning of the Vietnam era, it is the lack of training i.e. the manner in which our service women and men are fighting that keeps this tragedy going.

I would also suggest the vets of today are just like I was 25 or so years ago in the sense that they know there training is lacking, however, they just cannot explain what’s missing. However unlike me they refuse to accept that old fashion “black arts” are the answer i.e. should be the basis of basic training. And I now know the “Black art” tactics they and I should have been trained in and I can now say, “The PFC that told the Corp it was out of step, now has provided the proof”. What surprises me is that most vets it seems don’t care at all about the tactics I speak of and seem to view me as an unpatriotic “party pooper”, when I’m just a U.S. Marine trying to improve the Corps and save lives. Bottom line IMO the infantry needs to consist of unmarried i.e. undistracted, NO CHILDREN, dedicated true professionals, trained in the tactics listed in Tri-F and many more I am sure exist.

And to those that say “chivalry is for the museums” I say “first we must have peace on earth”.

One Newjarheaddean

“Let no Marines ghost say if my training had only done its job”

" Give me a million dollars and I well change the world"

" When it comes to persecution and suffering that fairly tale about christ dose not have (S) nothing on me"

" I well bet my lucky start"

“IKYG”

G-day!

Update; 12/19/14 09/53 hours




Total Pageviews

Monday, February 16, 2015

Me on Defense and National Interest site

AHOY!

Update; 02/17/15 20:25 hours eastern time zone. Here is another excerpt from the blog ARRSE, a British i.e. U.K. based site. I noticed a "red flag" beside my logo that was the Island of Die go, lol Diego Garcia. See update below. The note read "offline" i.e. as if I had been barred is my SWAG i.e. Scientific wild ass guess.


This is the exchange me and a Iraqi vet had on the site by the name of Defense and National Interest.

The Article we were commenting on was titled New Light Infantry Manual.

Article; and if you look this page up you well find links too fallow as well i.e. pertaining to the article.

The authors, the Fourth Generation Warfare Seminar at Quantico, observe that:
The light infantryman characterizes himself by his mental resourcefulness and physical toughness. Light infantry’s inborn self-reliance (the reason they were chosen to join Light Infantry units), reinforced by hard training, convinces them that they are able to overcome the most difficult situations that combat could present. Light infantrymen do not feel defeated when surrounded, isolated or confronted by superior forces. They are able to perform their duties for long periods of time without any type of comfort or logistical support, obtaining what they need from the land or the enemy. They are neither physically nor psychologically tied to the rear by the necessity to maintain open lines of communication. This attitude of self-confidence provides LI a great psychological advantage over its enemies. Thanks to its decentralized command philosophy, LI operates at a high tempo. An unpredictable ambush mentality and reluctance to follow a specified method is the essence of LI.



Comments

  1. jaylemeuxon 25 Sep 2008 at 12:36 am1
    ” Light infantry’s inborn self-reliance…”
    I have to say I’m extremely skeptical that the traits of a light infantryman are “inborn.” While the role of genetics in defining an individual can’t be ignored, humans are mainly social animals. They are products of their social environment. Light infantryman aren’t born any more than professional athletes are-they get where they are because they learned from their parents, peers, and NCOs.
    The last LI manual from the 4GW seminar asserted that soldiers from rural areas had some sort of insurmountable advantage over soldiers from urban areas.
    I once led a Marine from Little Rock, Arkansas. He grew up on the streets with gangsters. Since war is migrating out of the country and into the city, we used his expertise to our great advantage. He had spent his teenage years running from the cops. He taught us how to get around in the city without being seen, which is incredibly difficult. Were it not for his rise straight out of the projects, more Marines in our section might have died on nighttime squad patrols in Iraq.
    Being a light infantryman is not a job for everyone, not even every infantryman. I concede that. But it is not a job reserved for some genetic class, like something out of Gattaca. It is taught, not inborn.
    [CR: Perhaps it should have read "Light Infantry's inherent self-reliance ...]
  2. Newjarheaddeanon 26 Sep 2008 at 6:56 pm2
    AHOY, Jaylemeux. I don’t be leave the true art of infantry fighting tactics is being tout at all, hence Arkansas gangster teaching lots to US Marines on how to survive in the city. I would be interested in an example if you would please. I’m aware of the dog problem so what else. IMO a warrior class is exactly what could and should be allowed to develop. I’ve hard it said that the names on the tomb stones at Arlington have a certain commonality.
  3. jaylemeuxon 27 Sep 2008 at 3:09 pm3
    what kind of example are you looking for?
    the crux of his wisdom revolved around how to move from one shadow to another, and what to do when you come across the inevitable well-lit wide road or open field.
  4. Newjarheaddeanon 28 Sep 2008 at 10:03 am4
    AHOY, jaylemeux excuse me however those things sound like what should have been tout in basic or infantry schools not learned from a gangster. As far as I know about open fields you go around them (could be mined or ambushes). And if its raining you spread out abreast and zig zag cross to mix your foot prints to counter counting your unit. And leave area quickly. Well lit wide roads I would short out electricity in the area to counter lights (always keeping my dominate/shooting eye closed around possible or actual light sources) and cross roads mid way down the block in groups for starters. I just get a kick out of how strategy is the most important aspect of conflict yet it is discussed openly and endlessly by all. The library is full of books on the subject. However when it comes to tactics everyone acts like its all top secret. How did your unit deal with the brat scouts? LOL AKA children. G-day…
  5. jaylemeuxon 28 Sep 2008 at 2:10 pm5
    Maybe they should have, but they weren’t. Besides, even if they were I’d rather have him teaching Marines than some guy who’d never actually done it before. The learning curve was probably a lot higher while running from the cops.
    I suppose shorting out the electricity would work, but I think it’s pretty difficult to put into practice. For one, you’d have to get to a source of electricity that’s probably well lit in the first place, and then you’d have to have a guy who knew how to disable it without electrocuting himself. Even if it worked, you could only do it once or twice before the locals clued in to what you were doing. A lot of times there was just no way to go around a well lit area without eating up too much time or running into another well lit area. I mean, Ramadi is a city of 450,000. There’s gonna be a lot of lights.
    We never came up with an answer to kids. It’s amazing how good they are at spotting anything out of the ordinary.
  6. Newjarheaddeanon 29 Sep 2008 at 5:06 pm6
    AHOY, I find it odd that lights in Iraq where a problem at all, with electricity only 4-8 hours a day. Seems 22:00- 0400 hours time of most attacks and should have been lights out and prime patrol hours too. Fencing or wire cables over any group of lines should short out area lights. Like the Aluminum foil strip warheads used during the bombing campaigns. I know money etc is a problem and I say a sin to restricting options. But with the kids I would have tried to provide sports events etc to limit the numbers and non lethal weapons like stink bombs on the ones mothers could not control. Now I do salute your service and know you did not make all the calls. But I’m all about pointing out the lack of a professional killing USMC. So if the units where not always operating out ward from base camps and if the Marines had worn the wood land camouflage to distinguish themselves and no sun glasses and lived and slept with the people like the Marines were suppose to do the kids might have worked for us. G-day!
  7. Newjarheaddeanon 30 Sep 2008 at 1:15 pm7
    AHOY, I appreciate the feed back from someone who was over there. You’re the first one I’ve talked to. Also with crossing streets you try to find a low point and or cross just before or after a bend. Keeping the eye closed or covered pirate like is so when a light goes out you still have night vision when you expose your eye ball to shoot. The zig zaging across fields would be only used far behind enemy lines. And if going around was not a good option what did the Arkansas Marine suggest. Traditional smoke screens tend to drawl fire in urban situations so in Vietnam they used structure and brush fires etc. Was any of this tout in basic to the brave men and women to your knowledge? G-day!
  8. jaylemeuxon 01 Oct 2008 at 11:15 pm8
    It’s really hard to deal with the light in Iraq. In a lot of places, electricity’s been fairly reliable. In my AOs power outages were intermittent, but only so. It took us a few months to figure out which routes were dark or dim and which were well lit. As crossing streets goes, you spend 90% of your time on them in Iraq. Looking for low points or bends at every intersection can be just an incredible hassle, and the more times you use a particular crossing point the more dangerous it becomes. On top of that, depending on what time of the month it was, we were faced with the choice of rushing through some fairly well-lit areas or going the long way and getting caught by the moonrise.
    A lot of the time our choice was between a bad crossing point or a terrible one. We’d compress our formation up to the last concealed spot before the light, wait till no civilians were around, and run across the lit area one at a time. Nothing fancy about it. I’d be interested to see what true light infantrymen might do-perhaps they’d creep across the street slower than can be perceived by the human eye, assuming they had the time. Or maybe they’d be smarter than to conduct patrols in a populated city at all.
    Another choice I made was to make covert movement easier for my Marines by allowing them to leave the wire without all of the garbage we were required by unit SOP to carry (half of us rarely wore our groin protectors, and I even took my kevlar collar off once or twice). I would have gotten in enormous trouble had we ever gotten caught-probably would have lost my rank and billet-but my choice was between that or unnecessarily drawing attention in a city where we did not have a lot of friends.
    [CR: Thanks very much -- powerful first-person comment. Brings some reality to these discussions.]
  9. Newjarheaddeanon 02 Oct 2008 at 3:46 pm9
    AHOY THE TRUTH SHALL SIT US STRAIT… According to you’re first hand account you were winging it which means Marines are no better at combat operations than any other well disciplined motivated physically fit unit. A side from my belief about the extra steel to join in the first place. “In a lot of places, electricity’s been fairly reliable”. IMO that’s were the Son’s of Iraq live. The outages were sabotage according to CNN or maybe that was all propaganda. “It took us a few months to figure out which routes were dark or dim etc”. So you used the same routes? Was not planning of patrols aided by information from high tech remote sensors, UAVs or Satellites? We here so much talk about information over load. “As crossing streets goes, you spend 90% of your time on them in Iraq”. So crossing them or fields was never a big concern. IMO no units were shot at that much and dismounted only after the sky was full of helicopters UAVs and fixed wing aircraft. And please tell it to this Marine; why no sniper problem like we saw in Bosnia? I know it wasn’t well trained counter sniper teams. Semper Fi


Update; 02/17/15


AHOY,

This is very interesting. The weapons and supplies would be welcomed, however IMO they would not be a game changer but would make for a great reserve i.e. FPF (final protective fire) if a base of theirs was attacked.

I find it curious, how the U.S. spent so much time recently trying to find a host nation in Africa for its new African command headquarters.

Now the need appears to be so much greater, and they have one with great ports sweet crude oil and all.


Note the fallowing is my personal customary (e) signature signing. IKYG stands for " I'll kill you god" its a personal thing. G-day, is just "good day".



"I well bet my lucky star" IKYG

G-day!
Newjarheaddean, Sep 24, 2011


Second post on same article; 

AHOY,

In south Africa its the influence of the Christian missionaries that are holding back any sexual revolutions. CNN the other day ran a story about the Ugandan government I believe passing a law against short skirts.

And I know you well be as shocked as I was, however this year in March I believe four girls in Wilcox country in the State of Georgia of the U.S. of America, had to file a law suit to fight for the right to have their own "open to all races" prom.

That's right the school board has kept the event a private one, thus sub-contracted the event out to a private company that kept the event segregated. Whites had one blacks had another etc.


This imo is Christian fundamentalist based i.e. U.S. citizens with Taliban mentality, right here in the middle of the U.S. homeland.




G-day!
Newjarheaddean, Apr 20, 2013


And one thing I can add now is that I have learned LOTS from the street people that make up the Newjarheaddean. I am not the only tactical mother fucker out here. You see back before meeting the "old world" I had stayed away from home less people as much as possible. Not using the shelters to much and staying completely away from the churches, except in the twin cities that winter. It was just to cold. And in Vegas I worked with fellow employees who stayed in groups. I did at times like I have said try to find a gang or two, with not real luck. 

 Anywho! leaving Florida and after my arrival here I have made a real effort to get to know the homeless. And just met some of the greatest people anyone could ask to meet. Rangers, Marines, Engineers, pilots, doctors, businessmen, truck drivers, mechanics, whores, gangsters, cops etc.






Lil Wayne, that mans got some soul in him.



 "I MISS THE "OLD WORLD" AND WELL ALWAYS LOVE HIM" 

“Let no Marines ghost say if my training had only done its job”
" Give me a million dollars and I well change the world"
" When it comes to persecution and suffering that fairly tale about christ dose not have (S) nothing on me"
" I well bet my lucky start"
“IKYG”
G-(K)night




Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)