Welcome Aboard!

AHOY,


UPDATE 12/21/13, 11:42 HOURS

I am revealing who I am today i.e. posting my name, I am Keith Oeffinger, I was born in San Antonio Texas in 1963. See today's post 12/21/13 .


Update, 01/11/14 12:30 hours;

I would like to say, with only one reply, like three years ago, this blog seems too much like a mirror site to me. And it appears very few patriots are looking back at past posts.

The new “Fragmented Fighting Facts” series of posts that dedicates one post to each Basic rule has now been completed. This series starts with the post tilted “Post # 1, Planning, Preface” that posted on 05/12/13. This series is under the label “Tri-F in progress”. Posts well be updated as I edit or discover additional knowledge thus the series is the most current version of my "Fragmented Fighting Facts" manual. For an old but complete version i.e. all in one post copy. Patriots are welcomed to try viewing one of the “pages” listed in the “special word section” on the starboard side of the blog. I say try due to the fact I’m not sure if they are published i.e. viewable to the general public due to all the issues or HACKING with my blog. There is also a complete copy posted, that is titled, “Tri-F in progress” too, it was posted 11/13/10.

And feel free to fire away with a reply, (sarcasm on).


FLASH REPORT; the “TERRORIST ARE NOT AMONG US, AND NEVER WERE I.E. AL QAEDA IS A STAWL MAN, GHOST”.

The most important lesson that everyone should have taken away from the Boston Marathon bombings was that those young men proved that no al-queda members are in the u.s. Otherwise they too would just go get some presure cookers and had to a parade.

“I AM NOT A TERRORIST” this nation’s worst enemy is FEAR. This fear is being promoted mostly by the back woods, right wing, Christians of this nation. We need to separate church and state, period. And that is of course for the States sake.


I would like patriots to understand that I use the terms "official revealed fact" to mean what everyone is being told by officials, media etc. I use the term "kings truth" to mean what I know or believe to actually be the actual facts. I DO NOT MEAN IT IN A RELIGIOUS WAY. I.E. the term Kings is plural as in those running the show.


Preface for the Fragmented Fighting Facts

Note pink highlighted material is that, that IMO is questionable factually, it maybe an “official revealed fact” that I am questioning. The material may need to be defined i.e. explained more or it could be a personal note. Yellow is location undecided or unedited material i.e. unread that I have not decided on what to keep or not. Green means a change has been made i.e. an update. By noting the green updated highlights a Patriot well not have to read the Fragmented Fighting Facts in its entirety to stay current. Red is important, perhaps the "kings truth".

Newjarheaddean; this is my collection of combat notes. One might call it my anthology of combat tactics, techniques, methods and skills. The note taking began about fourty years ago (I was around 13 years old) with the observation of 10 rules listed with in a book covering the French and Indian i.e. Native American, wars, entitled “Roger’s Rangers”. That’s right the rules that started all this are “Army Ranger” rules, this book was located in the “Westfall” library in San Antonio Texas off of Vance Jackson. I get a kick out of the libraries name due to the general agreement that modern or state vs state warfare started with the singing of the peace treaties at Westphalia. I could not read at the time; however I knew that a list in a book on war would be important. I copied those rules down like a scribe might have written hieroglyphs and had my dad read them to me. . This discovery preceded numerous sources including approximately one hundred books and about a dozen field manuals, of which a few were of WWII era. These were found at libraries, half price bookstores and garage sales. Since going on line in 2007, I have found material on web sites such as “Defense and National Interest” (DNI), “Global security”, “Strategy page” , “Wikipedia” and “Bayonet strength” and “Efour4ever” in the combat lessons learned section. These last two sites cover WWII.

Previously referred to as K.O.O.L.N. (acronym definition, top secret), FLASH REPORTS; I NOW AM TELLING EVERYONE IT STANDS FOR KEITH OEFFINGER'S ORGANIZATION OF LEARNED KNOWLEDGE the joke on me here was I believed Knowledge was spelled with an (N). I was a special education student and did not learn to read until my last year of high school. I have now titled my work “Fragmented Fighting Facts” or “Tri-F”; the name derives from the computer grammar function always alerting me to the fragmented nature of my sentences. This is due to the “just the facts, ma’am” manor the material is written i.e. there has been little if any effort to write in whole sentences or provide context. This is not to say there is no order with Tri-F, in fact there is a theme. I have laid out the information as one might expect a commander or members of a unit to recall it thus utilizing it to conduct a mission.

We start with “Planning”, followed by the section on “Defense”, then there’s “Preparations and conduct of patrols” or “PCP”, and we end with “Conduct of Engagements” or “COE”, i.e. engagements being the term used here for shootouts. Each section of Tri-F consists of numbered “Basic rules”, each basic rule followed by detailed notes that either relate to, explain, or give examples pertaining to the basic rules. As with the general format of Tri-F, each section’s basic rules are laid out as one might need to recall them. This is most obvious in the last section COE starting with basic rule number one, “Flash report”, i.e. actions to take upon contact with the enemy. This sections last basic rule deals with handling POWs.

Keep in mind this is a work in progress; I’m constantly discovering new information to add which in turn still at times requires rearranging things. At the same time, interestingly enough to me, I have not needed to rearrange my original order of the basic rules for quite some time. There are however, two instances where the detailed information fallowing a pair of basic rules became so similar I decided to combine the pair into one basic rule. These two occurrences are noted in footnotes.

Now heed this, out of all the information contained within this work, only an estimated 1% was taught to me while I was serving in the U.S.M.C. Moreover, to put a fine point on it, it’s worth noting I served in Charlie Company, First Battalion, Fifth Marines, First Marine Division, i.e. an Infantry unit. Before my discharge (after only a two year cruse), I attended Jungle Warfare School in the northern training area of Okinawa (for two weeks), Mountain Warfare School in Korea (for one week) and Combat Town Camp Pendleton for MOUT training (for one day). I did not take part in any amphibious training nor did I ever go to Twenty Nine Palms for Desert Warfare training. We did ride around in AAVs once at Camp Pendleton. All in all I would say the only things I missed out on were a beach landing (at Coronado I believe) and a little sun burn, due to the fact that those twenty nine palms, I was told in the early eighties were all located at the front gate of that base. Needless to say, the training did not impress me, and I now know it was not going to get any better as some suggested to me at the time, and still others later claimed that I should have just stayed in longer.

With my position on the lack of training, I do wish to make it perfectly clear that I do support the service women and men in the U.S. armed forces. I also believe them to be as brave as any people on earth, (with the exception of the (Y) generation). My concern is in the way the Infantry especially is being mislead and used. I want people to understand my experience and IMO a lot of evidence suggests Uncle Sam intends to use his infantry in ways that does not include training any generation in the art of “traditional Guerilla combat tactics” i.e. as a “Traditional Commando” would be. I am not talking about “SWAT” team “Close quarter” tactics, like the “Stick dynamic entry”. That tactic should be called the “cluster f**k”. Just call that sort of tactic what it is NYPD (Cops T.V. show bad-boys, bad-boys) in Afghanistan.

The problem is that that tactic was developed by police departments to deal with an objective occupied by drugged up party animals, i.e. untrained civilians. The police never use it in a spur of the minute situation. They use it when the house/objective has been under constant surveillance for mouths in some cases and the police know all manner of information about everyone in the house and the structure and neighborhood in general. The cops choose a time when everyone is pasted out from partying the night before and have long lost any weapons (between the cushions or under the bed) they might have had on them as show pieces during the party. The primary reason for the large numbers of police in close proximity is to make sure the gang does not think the raid is a rival gang “brake in” and thus resist in any way. There is lots of yelling too, thus reinforcing the message that no one is trying to be covert, like one would be to get away with a crime.

This brings up an intriguing observation of mine; that being that by the book an assault should be made from the top down, yet the troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere use the Stick dynamic entry and usually enter from the front door, like a SWAT team. However resent high profile raids show the SWAT teams attacking from the top down. Examples you may recall are the raids on the Shinning path group in Peru in 2000 and the Mumbai raid by Indian forces on the Jewish center in 2008. IMO this proves the existence of what I’ll refer to as a “need to know” training policy, being followed by various governments, the purpose being to limit the number of true Commandos that could become tomorrow’s rebels, apposing corrupt governments. One last thing about the Stick, IMO every single time the regular forces unit conducting one of these foolish Stick dynamic entries comes under fire i.e. runs into resistance, the Stick brakes i.e. the whole unit evacuates and awaits some kind of support form tanks, guns, tubes or air. Bottom line IMO the Stick is used as a probing tactic and is meant to be a moral boosting show peace tactic to make the unit feel as if it has taken a hill, which was nothing more than another empty building, that IMO Intel suggested, was the case before the entry was ordered. Recalling the police policy of long periods of surveillance prior to raids.

It also seems to me that in light of the old saying “you can fight a war with bombs and blockades but only boots on the ground can win it” ( IMO, Uncle Sam has now revised that saying, as fallows) “you can win a war with bombs and blockades, but only the infantry can end the war”, farther more IMO Uncle Sam has gone one more step and decided to use private security companies and local i.e. indigenous people for the infantry role. All this fear of true commandos is all very similar to the “Mujahideen” not being allowed by various governments, to return to their homelands i.e. native nations, after fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan.

And as for the U.S. and other Western nations, training foreigners to fight a counter insurgency goes. IMO this training includes nothing more than police procedures i.e. conducting investigations, forensics, searching individuals and buildings to collect evidence and yes serving warrants, if necessary, with those all mighty “stick” tactics. And of course, lots of “new innovative techniques and tactics” involving CAS and IMO (Old) so called high tech equipment the U.S. Military Industrial Congressional Complex wants to clear out of the warehouses.

All in all IMO Uncle Sam has chosen to put just about all his eggs in one advanced technology system, think Star Wars Storm Troopers or Matrix i.e. the Operator or Morpheus trying to guide Neo and others to safety. IMO it looks something like this; (x) unit go to (x) address, kick in front door, use stairs to your right, go south down hallway to (x) door, it is unlocked, interning room go to (x) window looking out window to the north you will see your target running east though the neighbors garden. All this information and the “live” feeds of target and area of operations would be provided by a fleet of satellites as well as Near space assets that are never mentioned by the media as current military assets and of course there’s the robots, UAVs and a flood of other covertly deployed sensors as well as covert eves dropping of any civilian electronic devices in the Area of operations.

Thus in light of these and similar so called “new innovative, techniques and tactics” (notice the media and governments choice of words “techniques and tactics” as if we’re talking Commando training i.e. why not use some modern high tech terms the system is so eager to introduce us all to normally as a matter of routine), IMO Uncle Sam has placed the traditional Guerrilla combat tactics, on the back burner and is hoping they all go the way of other black arts.

This is not just true of the infantry; let us take a peek at aerial combat. Does anyone out there actually think today’s U.S. pilots are turning and burning, pulling high (G) maneuvers trying to hit the entry windows and get inside the bandits turn. Think any pilot has conducted a yo-yo or split S maneuver lately or made the choice between a single or two-circle fight. Now days its all about stealth, ECM and Smart even autonomous weapons, missiles especially BVR tech. IMO this explains why the U.S. Navy is not concerned with not having a front line fighter equal to the USAF F-22 Raptor. An article I recently read on “Strategy page” mentioned a lot of talk about a Navy F/A-18E at an air show, displaying a little F-22 silhouette decal i.e. a simulated Kill credit symbol/icon. IMO the F/A- 18E did not gun down that kill.

And then everyone knows that just about all now and IMO soon all weapons systems including the bayonet well have a chip in it.

So if the electronics ever fail (maybe due to a shift in the axis of earths electromagnetic field, passed a certain point or perhaps a record size solar flare) IMO it well be the masters of the age-old Guerrilla combat tactics i.e. The Fragmented Fighting Facts Basic Rules that survive, keeping in mind “no one wins”.

I also wish, that those who join the various services where told all this up front i.e. “we do not intend to train you as a traditional Commando”.

Another thing I would like everyone to consider is that; what makes a Marine special is not the training she or he receives, no it’s the steel the youth demonstrates when they choose to join the Marines. Even when compared to the Special Forces, who IMO are only specialists in their particular field, once again mostly high tech specialties and whose ranks are filled with older personnel that have already been serving and have graduated from a boot camp i.e. are aware of the hoop and hype hurry up and wait tactics. And who are then usually chosen i.e. coached into changing their MOS. I am aware of the change in recruitment policy after 2001 allowing for direct entry into the S.F. community. IMO a rarity and IMO it is still not the same as just choosing to go to a Marine Corps Recruit Depot from the start.

Furthermore, to those who just well not accept the truth about the lack of training along the lines of traditional Guerrilla combat tactics. I can now say that I have exchanged comments with a number of Iraqi and Afghanistan combat vets. These comments can be found on the internet if you Google up my call sign, Newjarheaddean also spelled with one (D). IMO it is obvious that the tactics I speak of are news to the vets, some have made commits that proves in combat they were just winging it. And no, I don’t believe that all the vets are observing some kind of code of silence on these tactics including the vets who are against the wars. Unless everyone wants to say that YouTube and other internet companies are conspiring to edit all combat footage that shows these tactics being used and that, the vets are staging other videos that show them (albeit with great bravery) as armatures without a clue and winging it. If anyone ever sees video, showing the tactics listed in Tri-F being used, be sure and provide a link with your comment. I once saw a flash of film on CNN showing combat in Lebanon during the 1980s that showed some of these tactics being used by a Guerrilla fighter. I well also say I do believe that UAV footage is edited by the Pentagon to keep the public from seeing the few but well trained Taliban and other Guerrilla fighters that are using these tactics. Alternatively, maybe people think our professional highly trained well-equipped military is unable to defeat 10 – 20 thousand religious extremist amateur thugs in almost a decade of fighting. All the while killing at least by some estimates 100 a mouth including dozens of top commanders.

Let me also say, on the numbers of U.S. PTSD casualties, i.e. IMO, WIA, (And IMO deserving of a Purple Heart). The Government portrays these cases as a result of fighting a war that is “unlike any other war we have fought before” (LOL). Facing an enemy that is fighting in some mysterious and or cowardly manor that simply cannot be countered by military means. I believe the high numbers are a result of US forces fighting in a manner that is suicidal i.e. pointless and counterproductive to the real world situation. Example; you have a young brave American ready to fight for the nation, while on one of these IMO “Russian roulette parades” someone shoots at the unit from some building, everyone scrambles for cover, as some spray and pray, then after determining the location using SWATS (Soldier Worn Acoustic Targeting Systems) sniper detectors, or one of the many similar vehicle mounted systems the commander calls in some sort of CAS, if someone’s brains have been blow out especially if it was an officer or the location is vague, a real “crowd pleaser” maybe used i.e. 2000 pounder.

IMO this is how 90% of engagements (fought by regular infantry units) are resolved. Special Forces are now and in the feature more and more regular infantry well be using the Matrix. And to those that think this is the exception I say show me the number of WIA or KIA (On either side) by small arms fire i.e. during traditional firefights. Even if one includes sniper fire those figures are really low. So IMO after witnessing all the carnage and innocent civilian life being lost and receiving all those looks from the witnesses, it is the American that realizes it is his unit that is not fighting right.

This is reinforced and really sinks in back in the states when the vet is asked to tell the Commando stories that never occurred and thus the vet must tell the truth i.e. give up the Commando reputation, keep it all inside or start lying. If the first option is chosen that unveiling reality is demoralizing and makes it all not worth it. If either one of the other chooses are made IMO the vet becomes the ticking bomb. And I can tell you all that many times, I have recalled being told once that “when you go home keep your mouth shut about the things we did. If you don’t you well be thought of as a liar or crazy and either which way your life well be over”. That First Sergeant was right, but like my daddy use to say, “He’s right but he does not know why he’s right” i.e. IMO the First Sgt. thought of what we did in terms of remarkable heroic feats. However, IMO certainly since the beginning of the Vietnam era, it is the lack of training i.e. the manner in which our service women and men are fighting that keeps this tragedy going.

I would also suggest the vets of today are just like I was 25 or so years ago in the sense that they know there training is lacking, however, they just cannot explain what’s missing. However unlike me they refuse to accept that old fashion “black arts” are the answer i.e. should be the basis of basic training. And I now know the “Black art” tactics they and I should have been trained in and I can now say, “The PFC that told the Corp it was out of step, now has provided the proof”. What surprises me is that most vets it seems don’t care at all about the tactics I speak of and seem to view me as an unpatriotic “party pooper”, when I’m just a U.S. Marine trying to improve the Corps and save lives. Bottom line IMO the infantry needs to consist of unmarried i.e. undistracted, NO CHILDREN, dedicated true professionals, trained in the tactics listed in Tri-F and many more I am sure exist.

And to those that say “chivalry is for the museums” I say “first we must have peace on earth”.

One Newjarheaddean

“Let no Marines ghost say if my training had only done its job”

" Give me a million dollars and I well change the world"

" When it comes to persecution and suffering that fairly tale about christ dose not have (S) nothing on me"

" I well bet my lucky start"

“IKYG”

G-day!

Update; 12/19/14 09/53 hours




Total Pageviews

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Past post no one seems to have viewed 12/19/15

Update 1/26/16 17:12 hours

 Update 12/19/15 17:32 hours

 Update; 12/19/15 15:02 hours; I decided below to type in the text with the images I am worried not everyone can read them. I well do this for all the images as soon as I can. maybe one more today before library closes. I have gotten lots of time on the computer today lol wouldn't you know it just when I did not have the time.

Ahoy,

So yeah it dose not seem as if anyone ever took a look at this post so I'm just reposting it. Well I don't know if the images well be viewible (like a slide show) if they are just copied and pasted in another posts. So I've provided a link for my Patriots to use.


http://newjarheaddean.blogspot.com/2011/07/old-forgotten-books-time-life-military.html



Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Old Forgotten Books Aerial combat part I

AHOY,


This is a Time life book published in 1988.
ISBN # 0-809-4-6058-0

If you click on image it well enlarge it so you can read it. I find these books interesting due to the fact IMO they show that the old publications were better at predicting and showing the future and the present publications are at explaining the present systems.





Image one the block of text reads as fallows;
As technology of powered flight approaches the end of its first century, combat aircraft threaten to exceed the capacity of humans to fly them. The mach two F-16 for instance can twist and turn about the sky in maneuvers that make the pilot feel nine times as heavy as his actual weight these gyrations may either drain blood from the pilots head, causing loss of consciousness called "black out", or force excess blood into the skull, resulting in a state of sensory confusion called "red out".

Yet pilot alertness is more critical now than ever before. On a combat mission a fighter pilots most combine a welter of instrument data and external information to create a three dimensional image of his targets, his aircraft and his enemies defenses. To help fighter pilots achieve this state of awareness under he stressful conditions of battle, the U.S. air force is developing a system of computerized assistance know as the "supercockpit". Planned for the mid 1990s, it well present to the pilot all the critical facts in a single panoramic display. 

Central to the "supercockpit is a helmet equipped with a special optical system that superimposes on the pilots view through the canopy pictures from an infra-red television camera, plus an over-lay of computer generated factors such as Altitude, air speed, weapons and engine status, and distance to a target via laser range finder. A computer synthesized voice warns he pilot of approaching enemy jets or other hazards and a cadre of intelligent sub-systems offers him advice on how best to respond to threats. 

Thus-- as exemplified by the imaginary mission on the fallowing pages, the pilot gets all the information needed to fly and fight without having to divert attention from the situation developing outside the cockpit.  





So here with this second image with the pilot setting here i decided to post to text just in case it is not viewble by everyone. I well do this for all the image as soon as I can.

The first box of text for the image above reads;
Embarking on a mission, to destroy a bridge, a fighter pilot climes into the cockpit and dawns a custom fitting helmet and a pair of special gloves, activating the "super-cockpit" system.

A data transfer module brought to the plane by the pilot, sends target, threat and navigation information to the computer. The computer tracks the position of the aviators head and hands by noting electrical signals induced in magnetic detectors in the helmet and gloves as they move with in a magnetic field in side the cockpit. 

Eye motion is measured by reflecting infrared light from his eyes to the micro T.V. camera.
From the pilots helmet orientation, infra-red sensors aimed outside and stored data the computer generates and image to supplement the view through the cockpit. Consisting of topographical contour lines and other important landscape features, the image is projected onto the helmets visor to help the pilot flight at night or when poor visibility causes the real world to dim. A hemispherical bubble in his lap show a bird's eye-view of the scene and a computer generated image of a control panel displays functions necessary for each phase of the flight. The pilot issues commands by touching the control panel as if it were a real one, or by voice.

Then in the smaller print it says;
A pilot moves a gloved finger toward the computer generated image of the control panel. Like the bubble display and computer generated interior sights, it is actually projected on to the pilots visor by tiny cathrodray tubes inside his helmet. From there a holographic mirror reflects a three diminutional image into the pilots eyes. When the pilot presses his finger against the control panel the computer through the glove provides a sense of having touched a flat surface and confirms the command by sending an audible click through earphones in the helmet. 








Image three the blocks of text read as fallows;

Yellow vertical lines in the computer generated view indicate compass headings; the jet is heading 20 degrees, appears in a box at the top of the picture, altitude is 110 feet above sea level--- is displayed in colored boxes, having a pointer that indicates weather the jet is climbing (green) or descending (red) or maintaining a constant altitude (yellow). The winged (W) shape nearby shows weather the planes nose is pointed above or below the horizon and weather the plane is in level flight or turning. Airspeed is appears to the left of the (W). Grid lines accent critical topography and give the pilot a sense of speed as they flash by superimposed on the runway, a crude representation of the jet has symbols that allows the pilot to drop bombs or fire missiles. An eight feature control panel lets the pilot display the jets status or vital signs (ST) and invoke navigation systems (NA) and communications (CO) as well as radar (RD) infra red (IR) and laser countermeasures (LA). The bottom two boxes on the panel are for warning the pilot of aircraft malfunctions and selecting a mode of operation--in route, air-air combat and ground attack for example the bubble display shows the entire airfield with the jet visible at the near end of the run way pointed for take off. 

Ive got to go now time is up.   






After an uneventful takeoff at dusk the pilot can relax: the on board computer linked to a network of sensors, closely monitors every aspect of the flight. A situation assignment module one of several subsystems in the computer continually scans the skies for other aircraft. The systems status module measures oil and hydraulic pressure as well as engine and exhaust temperatures. If the module detects an unusual value it alerts the pilot by lighting the CAUTION box on the control panel. The computer also keeps tabs on the pilot. A module called the guardian is hooked to sensors that measure the pilots blood pressure, breathing pattern and pulse rate. These measurements would enable the guardian to recognize the physiological signs of black out or red out and automatically take control of the aircraft until the pilot recovered. In addition the computer would limit the aircraft response to any instructions from the pilot that would stall the jet put it into a spin or otherwise damage it.

Then in the small box of text;
In the bubble display the pilot sees the planned flight path, represented by a red ribbon. A small white wedge represents the fighter's current position and direction. The evenings target a bridge is marked with a (T) The pilot may observe any part of the flight path from a different angle or greater detail. To inspect the terrain around the bridge for example the pilot could call up a magnified view by pointing to the target with an index finger and speaking the command zoom.


Here above in small print it reads:
The jet heads into the sunset at a cruising altitude of 3400 feet as the sky darkens computer generated imagery well occupy more and more of the pilots view replacing virtually all of the real sign except lights on the ground such as those that illuminate the two cities near the horizon. 







This text is for the top block of the page above. 
As the jet fly's down a canyon to elude enemy air defense radars, the computers speech synthesizer, suddenly warns of unidentified jets approaching on the right, "bogies" two o'clock. simultaneously symbols of two aircraft appear in the pilots field of view. The situation assessment module linked to infra-red search and track equipment has detected the jets and now using the laser-range finder, calculates range heading and speed.
Identifying the new players is the first order of business. The pilot says, "identify, IR". specifying that the computer use an infra-red television camera instead of radar that could reveal his presents. The computer presents an IR image for the pilot who immediately recognizes the distinctive features of an enemy interceptors.
The situation assessment module that has also identified the jets, by means of an intelligent pattern recognition program, alerts the tactics module, which handles battle management. It evaluates and ranks threats against the plane and tells the pilot when to fire weapons. With in a split second the tactics module has evaluated the pilots options and recommends a flight path that maximizes the chances of shooting down the enemy fighters. 
The pilot may over ride the proposal, except it or ask for more information. In this instance he fallows the suggestion, and instructs the computer to take over flying the plane so he can concentrate on the kill. 

In the small box of texts we have this.
The enemy jets are displayed in the upper right corner of the pilots field of view, high lighted by a red circle. The mode display on the control panel has changed from ENROUTE to AIR TO AIR reflecting the sudden shift to battle conditions. Snaking to the left is a series of three sided boxes that show the pilot where to fly for the best shot at the enemy. Preparing to fire, to be continued.  

 I'm out of time.    







Posted by at 


 "I MISS THE "OLD WORLD" AND WELL ALWAYS LOVE HIM" 
David and The Bomb and Ben in Austin that made me laugh one night harder and longer than I have that I can recall too
“Let no Marines ghost say if my training had only done its job”
" Give me a million dollars and I well change the world"
" When it comes to persecution and suffering that fairly tale about christ dose not have (S) nothing on me"
" I well bet my lucky star"
“IKYG”
Kahhhboooooomah!
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)